Study: Detention and alternatives to detention

EMN study in EU Member States on (alternatives to) immigrant detention in international protection and return procedures. The study identifies similarities, differences, practical challenges, and best practices in the Member States.

EMN Study: 'Detention and alternatives to detention in international protection and return procedures'

Research period – 2015-2020

Participating countries – Belgium (BE), Bulgaria (BG), Cyprus (CY), Germany (DE), Estonia (EE), Finland (FI), France (FR), Greece (EL), Hungary (HU), Ireland (IE), Italy (IT), Croatia (HR), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT), Luxembourg (LU), Malta (MT), the Netherlands (NL), Austria (AT), Poland (PL), Portugal (PT), Slovenia (SI), Slovakia (SK), Spain (ES), Czech Republic (CZ), Sweden (SE)

Content of the studyEMN Inform 'Detention and alternatives to detention in international protection and return procedures'

  • Follow-up to the previous EMN Study 'Use of detention and alternatives to detention in the context of immigration policies´ (2014)
  • Overview of alternatives to detention in EU Member States, focusing on:
    - the challenges and benefits of the alternatives compared to detention;
    - the procedures and criteria for the application of alternatives;
    - the effectiveness of detention and (lower impact) alternatives in return and asylum procedures.

Research questions

  • To what extent are different options for alternatives to detention available and applied across EU Member States?
  • What evidence exists about the impact of different forms of coercive measures on the effectiveness of return policies and international protection procedures?  

Publications EMN Study ‘Detention and alternatives to detention in international protection and return procedures’

Publications EMN Netherlands 'Detention and alternatives to detention in international protection and return procedures'